In this
post, I will be returning to my discussion earlier regarding the listed patents
associated with beverage sleeves and insulation. However, here, I will be discussing my
personal view on the anticipation and obviousness factor of each patent.
First, I want
to lay out what exactly I mean when saying “anticipation” and “obviousness” of
a patent. Both terms are aspects that
can result in the decline of a patent application in several ways. Anticipation refers to what is listed in a
previous patent, so as not to grant a second patent for an idea already
claimed. When an application for a
patent is requested, it must not replicate any of the specs listed in a previous
patent either explicitly or inherently.
Therefore, an anticipated patent is not really a patent at all. It is simply a design that has already been
listed under a previously granted patent.
Next, an
obvious patent is simply another version of a previous patent. When a patent is requested, it must
substantially differentiate itself from a pre-existing patent. It doesn’t make concrete sense to issue a
patent for a general design of something that has already been granted patent
rights. By doing so, the patent system
would be meaningless such that the whole goal of a patent is to protect
intellectual property. Based from these
two types of patents, we can summarize that a patent is only granted if and
only if the application is in fact original, and not identical to any
previously issued patents.
Applying
these concepts to the patents listed in my previous discussion, we can follow
the chronological trail that continuously improves the use of beverage
sleeves. First, the thermal coffee cup
was the basic framework designed in 1948.
From that, in 1999, we can see its evolution to adding heat activated
glue-dots to improve insulation. Once
the cup itself had been properly insulated, we moved on to the theme of
beverage sleeves with the “Insulating Sleeve.”
This sleeve provided air gaps between the cup and the sleeve to allow
heat to escape from exterior of the cup.
Better sleeves were then developed that provided grip, different layers
for several different purposes, to finally a sleeve that can inform the consumer
as to the temperature of the beverage inside the container.
As time
progressed, better and better designs and techniques began to be developed and
expand on its predecessor. These patents
and applications, though improving on each other, are neither obvious nor
anticipated and were thus granted patent rights. From the basic “Thermal Coffee Cup” to the “Temperature
Indicating Sleeve and Related Container”, each patent has achieved the ability
to better insulate beverages and provide convenience to consumers in the forms
of better grips and temperature gauges.
Great job defining Anticipation and Obviousness. Took me a few tries to understand it myself and you really made it clear. I liked how you evaluated each patent as a continuation of others, rather than as a stand alone invention. Was the same method I took and glad to see I wasn't the only one.
ReplyDeleteHey Chris! Great comment. I completely agree that he did a good job defining Anticipation and Obviousness. I like how you stated specific examples of what was good int he blog post. For example, you states how you liked the evaluation of each patent as a continuation . Keep up the good work :)
DeleteI also thought your description of anticipation and obviousness to be very good. "Anticipation refers to what is listed in a previous patent" and "an obvious patent is simply another version of a previous patent" allowed me to very clearly separate the two.
ReplyDelete